Leadership is Authenticity, Not Style – By Bill George

Synopsis

Bill George’s “Leadership is Authenticity, Not Style” posits that leaders need to be authentic and genuinely desire to serve others. He argued that an authentic leader knows their weaknesses and works on them. The key concept is to be yourself. According to George, authentic leaders practice solid values, lead with their heart, establish close and ensuring relationships, and demonstrate self-discipline.

Authentic leaders are not overly concerned with their success or money. Their focus is on the people around them and helping them to succeed. George also argued that authentic leaders demonstrate a variety of different leadership styles. He suggested that the leadership style was not in question nor what makes a leader successful. Their level of authenticity within their organization and with their people is what makes them successful. 

Lastly, George argued that an authentic leader is not born. They must develop their compassion and heart for their people, just as they must work on their weaknesses and leadership skills. 

Just My Thoughts

First let me say, the article has its points. However, I’m not sure I agree entirely with George. Here is why. He argued that leadership theories and traits are things that subordinates should emulate and others need to adapt. He further argued that authentic leaders desire to serve others, almost suggesting that those that learn about and adapt theories and traits do not. 

This could be my interpretation, but that could also be because I believe there is a thin line that we walk when we discuss authenticity and leadership. There is such a thing as being too authentic. I agree that a leader should lead with compassion, know their weaknesses, work on them, and be themselves. It is not easy being one person at work and changing during your drive home to be someone else. 

Leadership traits and theories have a place in the realm, and so does authenticity. However, being too authentic can lead to vulnerability. Then again, that is my two cents. 

I do recommend you read his article. As I mentioned, it could easily be my interpretation of what he is arguing. Unfortunately, I have been authentic in leadership and found there is a time and place for it. Sometimes being authentic allows others to take advantage of you and your compassion. There is a balance and a thin line.